Thursday, November 4, 2010

Small loans lenders could not afford to buy candidates

Businesses have a right for making campaign contributions like individuals do. Even small loans providers like payday advance loan companies. That said, some people do not think it’s morally right. Any contribution, according to some, by any business amounts to bribery. For instance, any elected official that is opposed to capping or banning payday advances is automatically assumed to have been bought off. Payday advance lenders don’t posses that sort of cash, and also the argument is hypocritical to boot. Source for this article – Small loans lenders could hardly afford to buy elections by Personal Money Store.

Purchasing officials something the small loan sector gets accused of

Payday loan and installment loans lenders, along with other small loan companies, are allowed to lobby politicians in order for making sure they get some say, along with all of other trade organizations. It is ok for the organizations for making campaign contributions. It is something lawful that they do. Sometimes they host conferences that officials are invited to, and there are plenty of other organizations that lobby incumbents or candidates. There is apparently a double standard though. For instance, in a recent New Mexico gubernatorial debate, according to the newest Mexico Independent, Democratic candidate Diane Denish practically accused Susana Martinez of being bribed by cash advance lenders because a fundraiser for Martinez was partially run by a lobbyist employed by the option financial services business.

Where the rules come from

It does not mean much to have contributions made to a candidate. One business doing it is not important. Who gets to say that one organization is better than another when it comes to donating? Besides, payday loan and small loan providers as an industry can’t afford to actually purchase off anybody. $57,900 went to Congressional Rep. Heath Shuler of North Carolina in the 2010 election fund. That counts all donations from the whole payday lending organization. Senator Chris Dodd, by comparison received $152,100 from the Royal Financial institution of Scotland alone this year. Anyone can check out lobbying data on OpenSecrets.org, and may be surprised at what they discover about their own representatives.

Just the small contribution

Small loan lenders are only able for making really small contributions. Of course, high finance and banks are apt to make much larger donations when it comes to lobbies. Election campaigns end up with unions paying out probably the most. That's where much of the contributions come from. Looking at history, unions are hardly squeaky clean by any stretch of the imagination. A bribe isn’t what a contribution is. You can read more in Payday advance loan Facts and Statistics Record on Personal Money Store.

Articles cited

New Mexico Independent

newmexicoindependent.com/65582/the-men-behind-martinezs-payday-loan-fundraiser



No comments:

Post a Comment